particle size distribution analyzer la-300 (HORIBA Ltd)
HORIBA Ltd is a verified supplier 
90
Structured Review
HORIBA Ltd
particle size distribution analyzer la-300
Particle Size Distribution Analyzer La 300, supplied by HORIBA Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/particle+size+distribution+analyzer+la-300/la+920/us12275269-383-17-20
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Particle Size Distribution Analyzer La 300, supplied by HORIBA Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/particle+size+distribution+analyzer+la-300/la+920/us12275269-383-17-20
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
particle size distribution analyzer la-300 - by Bioz Stars,
2026-10
90/100 stars
Images
Related Articles
other:Article Title: Thermochromic writing instrument Article Snippet: It should be noted that the average Article Title: Thermochromic writing instrument Article Snippet: The average Article Title: Low temperature fabrication of magnesium phosphate cement scaffolds by 3D powder printing. Article Snippet: Synthetic bone replacement materials are of great interest because they offer certain advantages compared with organic bone grafts.. Biodegradability and preoperative manufacturing of patient specific implants are further desirable features in various clinical situations.. Both can be realised by 3D powder printing. Membrane:Article Title: Fabrication of tubular-type MF ceramic membrane with enhanced permeability by addition of PMMA in the support and evaluation of physical characteristics for wastewater treatment Article Snippet: In this study, a novel tubular-type ceramic membrane with higher permeability was fabricated and its physical characteristics for microfiltration were evaluated.. The membrane was composed of the support and active layer which is a coating of the support for selective permeation.. Many macro pores under 1 μm up to 40 μm in diameter could be successfully formed in the support. Emulsion:Article Title: Oil-in-water emulsion cosmetic composition and method for producing the same Article Snippet: .. TABLE 17 (1) Sensory evaluation criteria for textile and indication Sensory evaluation criteria Indication of sensory evaluation Scores Evaluation results Average of scores Sensory evaluation 4 Excellent texture 3.5-4 A 3 Ordinary texture 3.0-3.4 B 2 Slight texture 2.0-2.9 C 1 Nearly no texture 1.0-1.9 D 0 No texture 0-0.9 E TABLE 18 (2) Sensory evaluation criteria for greasy feel and indication Sensory evaluation criteria Indication of sensory evaluation Scores Evaluation results Average of scores Sensory evaluation 4 No greasy feel 3.5-4 A 3 Nearly no greasy feel 3.0-3.4 B 2 Slight greasy feel 2.0-2.9 C 1 Some greasy feel 1.0-1.9 D 0 Very greasy feel 0-0.9 E TABLE 19 (3) Sensory evaluation criteria for transparent feel and indication Sensory evaluation criteria Indication of sensory evaluation Scores Evaluation results Average of scores Sensory evaluation 4 Excellent transparent 3.5-4 A feel 3 Ordinary transparent 3.0-3.4 B feel 2 Slight transparent feel 2.0-2.9 C 1 Poor transparent feel 1.0-1.9 D 0 No transparent feel 0-0.9 E TABLE 20 (4) Sensory evaluation criteria for compatibility and indication Indication of sensory evaluation Sensory evaluation criteria Average Sensory Scores Evaluation results of scores evaluation 4 Excellent compatibility 3.5-4 A 3 Ordinary compatibility 3.0-3.4 B 2 Slightly poor compatibility 2.0-2.9 C 1 Poor compatibility 1.0-1.9 D 0 Very poor compatibility 0-0.9 E [Evaluation of Physical Properties] (1) Average Emulsified Article Title: Composition for cosmetics, cosmetic, method for producing oil-in-water emulsion cosmetic, and two separate layer-type cosmetic Article Snippet: .. [Measurement of Average Particle Diameter of Emulsion Particles] The average particle diameter of the prepared emulsion was measured with a Purification:Article Title: Oil-in-water emulsion cosmetic composition and method for producing the same Article Snippet: .. TABLE 17 (1) Sensory evaluation criteria for textile and indication Sensory evaluation criteria Indication of sensory evaluation Scores Evaluation results Average of scores Sensory evaluation 4 Excellent texture 3.5-4 A 3 Ordinary texture 3.0-3.4 B 2 Slight texture 2.0-2.9 C 1 Nearly no texture 1.0-1.9 D 0 No texture 0-0.9 E TABLE 18 (2) Sensory evaluation criteria for greasy feel and indication Sensory evaluation criteria Indication of sensory evaluation Scores Evaluation results Average of scores Sensory evaluation 4 No greasy feel 3.5-4 A 3 Nearly no greasy feel 3.0-3.4 B 2 Slight greasy feel 2.0-2.9 C 1 Some greasy feel 1.0-1.9 D 0 Very greasy feel 0-0.9 E TABLE 19 (3) Sensory evaluation criteria for transparent feel and indication Sensory evaluation criteria Indication of sensory evaluation Scores Evaluation results Average of scores Sensory evaluation 4 Excellent transparent 3.5-4 A feel 3 Ordinary transparent 3.0-3.4 B feel 2 Slight transparent feel 2.0-2.9 C 1 Poor transparent feel 1.0-1.9 D 0 No transparent feel 0-0.9 E TABLE 20 (4) Sensory evaluation criteria for compatibility and indication Indication of sensory evaluation Sensory evaluation criteria Average Sensory Scores Evaluation results of scores evaluation 4 Excellent compatibility 3.5-4 A 3 Ordinary compatibility 3.0-3.4 B 2 Slightly poor compatibility 2.0-2.9 C 1 Poor compatibility 1.0-1.9 D 0 Very poor compatibility 0-0.9 E [Evaluation of Physical Properties] (1) Average Emulsified Viscosity:Article Title: Oil-in-water emulsion cosmetic composition and method for producing the same Article Snippet: .. TABLE 17 (1) Sensory evaluation criteria for textile and indication Sensory evaluation criteria Indication of sensory evaluation Scores Evaluation results Average of scores Sensory evaluation 4 Excellent texture 3.5-4 A 3 Ordinary texture 3.0-3.4 B 2 Slight texture 2.0-2.9 C 1 Nearly no texture 1.0-1.9 D 0 No texture 0-0.9 E TABLE 18 (2) Sensory evaluation criteria for greasy feel and indication Sensory evaluation criteria Indication of sensory evaluation Scores Evaluation results Average of scores Sensory evaluation 4 No greasy feel 3.5-4 A 3 Nearly no greasy feel 3.0-3.4 B 2 Slight greasy feel 2.0-2.9 C 1 Some greasy feel 1.0-1.9 D 0 Very greasy feel 0-0.9 E TABLE 19 (3) Sensory evaluation criteria for transparent feel and indication Sensory evaluation criteria Indication of sensory evaluation Scores Evaluation results Average of scores Sensory evaluation 4 Excellent transparent 3.5-4 A feel 3 Ordinary transparent 3.0-3.4 B feel 2 Slight transparent feel 2.0-2.9 C 1 Poor transparent feel 1.0-1.9 D 0 No transparent feel 0-0.9 E TABLE 20 (4) Sensory evaluation criteria for compatibility and indication Indication of sensory evaluation Sensory evaluation criteria Average Sensory Scores Evaluation results of scores evaluation 4 Excellent compatibility 3.5-4 A 3 Ordinary compatibility 3.0-3.4 B 2 Slightly poor compatibility 2.0-2.9 C 1 Poor compatibility 1.0-1.9 D 0 Very poor compatibility 0-0.9 E [Evaluation of Physical Properties] (1) Average Emulsified |